Televaulting Eliminates Need for Backup Agents on Each VMware VM

| | Leave a comment

Companies have a love-hate relationship with VMware. Most companies know that most of the resources on their existing Linux and Windows servers are underutilized by the applications running on them. So the idea that they can consolidate multiple physical servers (typically 10 - 30 servers) down to just one appeals to them on multiple fronts. Lower energy costs, lower administrative costs and less data center floor space are just some of the benefits that they will likely experience.

The problems start when companies begin to manage applications running on individual virtual machines (VMs). No longer do applications have access to an entire server's resources such as CPU, memory and bandwidth when they running. Rather the VMware hypervisor must allocate specific server hardware resources to each guest operating system and the applications running on them. To appropriately manage these environments, server administrators therefore need a higher level of aptitude so that when they virtualize 10 - 20 servers on the same physical hardware they do not create application performance bottlenecks.

Companies need to decide what types of data need to be protected. All backup methods do not protect all data and file types. Companies need to consider if they want to protect VMs, files, ESX and VMDKs and if bare metal restore (BMR) is a requirement. Companies have the option of using different backup methods to ensure total protection or to opt for an integrated data management system.

Also problematic in VMware environments is when each VM's backup process kicks off in the middle of the night. Now each backup software agent on each VM is consuming server resources (CPU, memory and network bandwidth) plus it is accessing storage resources assigned to that server. At this point, the VMware hypervisor kicks in and limits how much available server resources each VM can have according to preset policies. Since multiple backup jobs may kick off at the same time or kick off while other backup jobs are still running, the problem is exacerbated

The impact of restricting server resources on each VM on the physical server is difficult to predict. However problematic in VMware environments is when each VM's backup process kicks off in the middle of the night. Now each backup software agent on each VM is consuming server resources (CPU, memory and network bandwidth) plus it is accessing storage resources assigned to that server In a worst case scenario, it can even impact mission critical production applications on the VMware server because the application can not access needed server and storage resources because backups are kicking off on other VMs on that particular server.

What companies are coming to realize is that introducing VMware into their environment needs to change their entire paradigm of how they manage servers - from the applications running on them to the data they protect. In the case of data protection, the change is even more extreme. Enterprise companies can not and should not expect their existing version of backup to work well in this new virtual world as it was designed to work from a totally different premise.

This new data protection paradigm is what Asigra's Televaulting is designed to address. Rather than placing backup software agents on each VM, Asigra's agent-less architecture remotely accesses the data on each VM and backs up VMs, files, ESX and VMDKs using a daily incremental backup or via CDP (continuous data protection) while providing for bare metal restore if needed. How it does this with minimal impact to each VM and the underlying physical server is the focus of the next blog entry.

2 Comments

craig said:

Jerome,
Excellent article- I think you're on the cutting edge of a growing issues. I'd like to see more information on:
- what the specific recovery requirements are of each VMware-specific file type?
- how alternative storage media/solutions might fit with related file types?

For example, should data files snapshots be made more frequently than images? What does this mean about total size of data archived, storage performance, SLA requirements and RTO's?

thanks,
Craig

Craig,

Thanks for taking the time to read the blog entry and post a comment.

These are such good questions that I plan to devote an entire blog entry or two in the coming weeks in order to thoroughly answer them. Stay tuned and in the meantime feel free to ask any other questions you may have.

Jerome

Leave a comment

Entry Sponsorship

This entry is sponsored by Asigra Inc.

About Asigra Inc. Blog

    Asigra Televaulting and Televaulting ILM-aware: Agentless, secure online backup and restore solutions protect over 4 petabytes of remote office/branch office (ROBO) data on laptops, desktops and servers. Since 1986, the company's agentless Televaulting solution has centralized data management and eliminated agent-based software compliance, pricing and performance issues for multi-site enterprises and SMBs.